Cover Designations for Classified USAF Aircraft

Copyright © 2004 Andreas Parsch

Background

In the late 1960s the U.S. Air Force began to acquire Soviet fighter aircraft for the purpose of evaluation and air-to-air combat training. The acquistion and use of these aircraft was then highly secret, and operations were flown from the test facility at Groom Lake, Nevada (a.k.a. "Area 51"). The aircraft types flown included the MiG-17 and MiG-21 initially, and later also other MiGs (e.g. MiG-23) and presumably some Sukhoi types.

Just like any other USAF pilots, the men flying the secret aircraft had to log their flight hours in standard USAF forms. These forms required the entry of the aircraft type flown, but of course you couldn't simply write "MiG-21" into that line! At some time early in the program, someone had the idea to use "fake" cover designations, which looked like ordinary Air Force designations, but which were not used by any actual aircraft. It was decided to continue the old F-for-Fighter series of the USAF, which had reached F-111, but had been discontinued in 1962 when the DOD introduced a new joint designation system. Therefore, the numbers used were 110 (the original F-110A designation had been replaced by F-4C, so that 110 was de facto unused), 112, 113, etc. All designations were prefixed by a "Y", indicating a test model. Over the years, the system of assigning YF-1xx designations was extended to U.S.-built secret aircraft as well.

Note: Although none of the above is officially acknowledged by the USAF, it isn't explicitly denied either, and there is enough evidence available to ascertain that the information given above is essentially correct. For example, the author's FOIA request to the AFFTC (Air Force Flight Test Center) at Edwards AFB for "YF-xxx" designations for revealed projects (e.g. HAVE BLUE, TACIT BLUE, "Bird of Prey") did not return with a "No records found" response. Instead, records were forwarded by AFFTC's 412th TFW to the Pentagon office SAF/AAZ (Secretary of the Air Force, Directory of Security and Special Programs Oversight). Although the records were denied in full, their existence was not denied.

Apart from fake designations, fake USAF serial numbers were used as well. The latter are reported to include 75-001, 75-004, 75-008 and 75-010, which are all officially listed as "cancelled serials".

Known and Rumoured Numbers

Because the USAF so far doesn't officially acknowledge the use of said cover designations, all numbers presented here are technically rumours only. However, several numbers have been forwarded by reliable sources so that there can be no doubt that at least some secret aircraft did indeed receive such designations.

The "References" column indicates the sources of the alleged designations:

[1] Curtiss Peebles: "Dark Eagles"
[2] Official USAF biographies, an example being the biography of John T. Manclark. The references to YF-110 and YF-113 in the list of aircraft flown are gone, but were originally included. The original version of the file can still be seen on the FAS site.
[3] Aviation Week & Space Technology. In 2000 and 2001, there were a few short notes in AW&ST about the alleged YF-113G aircraft. These notes included some information on the use of YF-1xx designations.
[4] Peter Merlin. Peter is an aviation historian with some detail knowledge about operations at Groom Lake.
[5] Tom Smith. Tom (not his real name) is a person, who has provided some information as well as the background story how he acquired his data (this story explains why he doesn't know the actual aircraft type associated with each designation). He asked not to reveal his name or background.
[6] Joseph Jones. Author and (self-proclaimed) "insider" on secret aircraft projects.

A blank "Remarks" column means that the respective designation has been quoted by the source(s), but no details whatsoever have been provided.

Designation

References

Remarks

YF-110

[1,2]

YF-110 is associated by [1] with the MiG-21. However, no specific subtype is mentioned, and it is possible that all actual YF-110 designators had a suffix letter

YF-110B

[4,5]

[5] quotes the serials 75-001, 75-004 and 75-010 for this type.

YF-110C

[5]

 

YF-112

[3,4]

This is mentioned as "used for a MiG". It is likely that this remark only refers to the general use of "YF-112" for ex-Soviet aircraft, and not a specific type. Therefore a "plain" YF-112 designation (without suffix) may be non-existent.

YF-112C

[5]

 

YF-113

[1,2,5]

[1] associates the general YF-113 designation with the MiG-23. [5] explicitly claims the use of a plain (no suffix) YF-113 designation.

YF-113B

[3,4]

This is said to be an aircraft of the MiG-23/27 "Flogger" family.

YF-113E

[3]

This is said to be another variant of the MiG-23.

YF-113G

[3,4,6]

There was much speculation about this designation, and there have actually been three different ideas about the identity of the YF-113G:
  (1) a MiG-23 (of unknown subtype)
  (2) a very early stealth test bed, flown in the 1970s (possible even before HAVE BLUE)
  (3) a secret prototype developed and flown in the 1993/96 timeframe
However, the more reliable sources (including [4]) clearly say that item (3) is correct. The erroneous claim (1) may have stemmed from confusion with other YF-113 designations (e.g. YF-113B/E).

YF-114C

[4,5]

[4] says this is an unidentified MiG type.

YF-114D

[5]

The serial 75-008 is quoted as used by a YF-114D.

YF-117A

(multiple)

Although never explicitly said, it is assumed that the Lockheed SENIOR TREND aircraft had received the YF-117A cover designation. This designation was eventually allocated as the official designation when the aircraft was revealed to the public, thus creating the only official post-111 F-designator.

YF-117E

[4,6]

Reported to be unrelated to the F-117A

F-121

[6]

This is claimed to be the designation for a pure-delta stealthy high-speed reconnaissance aircraft developed by General Dynamics (now Lockheed Martin). For details about this aircraft, see this page (based on info from [6]). However, it must be noted that the story of this aircraft and its F-121 designator is questionable at best.

YF-1xx

[4]

Northrop TACIT BLUE. This aircraft had a YF-1xx designation, but not in the -113() series.

YF-1xx

[4]

Boeing Bird of Prey. This aircraft had a YF-1xx designation, but not -113G.

There are also reports which link the F-116 and F-118 designations to the MiG-25 and MiG-29, respectively. But these reports are rather vague rumours which do not claim any "first hand source" as a reference, and are therefore not included in the above listing.

Additional Information

Even if no official and only very limited unofficial information is available on the system of cover designations, one can draw a few conclusions:

- The designations are not allocated in the same way as "normal" designations. I.e., the USAF office responsible for the assignment and maintenance of official aircraft designations is not involved.

- Most likely the designations are not allocated on the basis of one number per basic aircraft type and one suffix letter per version. As can be seen from the examples in the preceding section, the numbers 113 and 117 with different suffixes were apparently used by several types. Additionally, the numbers and suffix letters are not assigned in numerical and alphabetical sequence. It obviously makes sense to hide the actual number of different designations this way.

- The "F" or "YF" prefix doesn't mean "Fighter" as in normal designations (at least not anymore). Evidence for this is the TACIT BLUE, which had a YF designation, but wasn't designed in any way to be a fighter. It makes sense to hide the mission or type of a secret project by simply assigning the same designation prefix to all aircraft.

- It's possible that the Lockheed HAVE BLUE never received a YF-1xx style designation.





Comments and corrections to: Andreas Parsch



Back to Home page


Last Updated: 11 December 2004